Life passes from one person to another in more means than just sex and 
birth. Life is the connections between living things, not the individual 
things themselves which are only to make life possible. Literally "only 
between life there is life". It is not in you or in the other, but in 
the empty space and the time between. The relationship. The separation 
is illusionary in a sense, but experiences are NEVER less than they 
seem, even if from a pessimistic point of view, they are never more. 
See the plus.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 

All truth matches experience. If beings could perceive the Universe differently, they would have different experiences and different notions about truth and how it operates. It is not that our views would be inadequate or even wrong, just not applicable. This does not mean our views are perfect either, even in our limited contexts. There are countless things we purposely leave out of our thinking and reasonings to build up what we wish to do. We can see further, but only when 
convinced we should. Seeing further is simply not omitting relationships between different parts of our environments and experiences. We are parts destined to see and experience only other parts, but our minds are attempts to build wholes again. These wholes can take almost any form we choose to give them and that form is always determined first and foremost by the purpose we wish to achieve with it. To make people want to learn to do and to be more, you need to give them a greater sense of purpose and the rest will follow as a matter of course.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

People look without seeing what seeing is. People think without knowing what thinking is. Without an outside perspective upon perspective, people are as programmed as birds migration, fish to where they must spawn, whales to where they hope to go to die. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

People are controlled most directly and without their knowledge by what ideas they are exposed to, by how they are presented to them as to their "correct" interpretations for them, and what they ought to aspire to do or to become. Nations have been given control over all these, free to brainwash all within their borders as they see fit, and hypocritically criticize others for doing the same. Most people, especially poorer and less educated but not solely, eat up propaganda and love it while at the same time are brainwashed enough to think they have no taste for it or it does not exist. Tell me who to hate this week, give me a clue what's right to think so I can find and bash anyone who says differently.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 

Countries or people of ethnic or religious groups who hate those of another, and if they admit it to themselves, would not mind waking up tomorrow to find all of their enemies had magically disappeared or dead, must be made to realize such feelings (hatred) are worse than any human beings could ever be. By believing those feelings in the other group, are stronger or more common than in people in your group towards them can be thought to justify such feelings or even acting upon them, they will find they are breeding that which they tell themselves what they despise. No matter which side wins, that feeling of hate will always control them until everyone else is dead or they understand it and come to grips with its power to eat away at themselves, and each other is merely an excuse to let it keep doing so.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Peace is hope and hope is the child of life. War is despair and despair is borne of hopelessness. Despair serves no master and knows no chains. It consumes all before it is satisfied. Hope is all that can defeat it. Killing hope, whether yours or someone else's, is inevitably the same thing. Self-destruction.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 

The most ideal forms of government are not defined by what they are at any given point but by their willingness to completely rethink themselves and, if necessary change accordingly, even to something else entirely but keeping and advancing the means to communicate on new changes and preserve that adaptability. Like everything else, its value is in the search, not the actuality. All forms of government will always be flawed, incomplete, unfair to many, and ultimately are provisional upon sets of circumstances always in flux. To keep all variables to change itself, or even most, under control or accounted for to preserve any present form, it ultimately is totalitarian, however benevolent its face may seem. If change and adaptation of structures are necessary, the ability to rethink things, even everything, is like a release valve for discontent which leads to extremism and even ultimately to terrorism. As long as the means to achieve autonomy are structural and real and realizable within ones lifetime, and one has faith in that chance for positive change being more likely than what can be achieved through violence, peaceful change will always more often be preferred eventually when passions have time to cool.